Pandora Beada of the sept 11 attacks

19. března 2014 v 2:11
British official charges us British official charges us A senior member of the ruling british labour party has charged that the bush management had advance knowledge of the september 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and ensured that they take place in order to further longstanding plans for the invasion and occupation of iraq. The declare that meacher is not"Serious or quality"Has no footings.He is not a back bench maverick or a member of what the precise wing british press likes to refer to as the"Mad left, however, he was the labour party's most sensed cabinet minister, having worked on in parliament for 33 years, holding various cabinet posts going back to the wilson and callaghan organizations in the 1970s.He served in blair's cabinet as normal minister for six years until he was removed in june amid the mounting crisis of the labour government over the iraq war.He played a prominent role in the negotiation of the kyoto accords on air and was long considered a contender for the position of labour party leader. That someone with these political connections charges in print that elements within the us governing control knew that a terrorist attack was coming on september 11 and allowed it to happen to further their war plans represents an extremely dangerous development for the bush white house.He speaks not merely for himself.The thesis he advances is indicative of what is assumed and is being said behind the curtain among much wider circles within the sole major government to have backed washington in its invasion of iraq. It is doubtless that the content was motivated by the deepening crisis of the blair government itself over the exposure of the lies it used to promote the iraq war.With continuing revelations from within the government's own mind agencies about the fabrication of evidence against iraq, recent polls have shown a lot of britons in favor of blair's resignation. The questions meacher raises have never been answered by anyone in the government.On the eve of the second birthday of the september 11 terrorist attacks, the american public knows next to nothing more about what happened that day and how it was allowed to happen than it knew two years ago.The bush white house has made every effort to derail or stonewall any independent explore into these tragic events.Even today, no one has explained how supposed terrorists, under the monitoring of the fbi and the cia, were permitted to enter the us, commandeer commercial aircraft and fly them unhindered until striking rear doors. Meacher's article pursues many of the same themes that had been raised over the past two years by the world socialist web site concerning the way the september 11 events were seized upon by the bush government to drive forward its longstanding plans for military aggression, as well as the ample evidence that the costa rica government was repeatedly warned about the impending attacks, yet neglected to take even routine actions to counter them. Meacher rejects the state explanation that the successive us wars in afghanistan and iraq represented washington's response to the attacks on the pentagon and new york city's twin towers, filing,"The truth may be a considerable amount murkier, He begins by citing a document issued in 2000 by the right wing wa think tank, the work for a new american century(Pnac), An outfit that served as the Republican administration's national security establishment in waiting until its ideas could be implemented following installing Bush as president in 2001. Eligible,"Restructuring america's defenses, the central plans of this document were incorporated towards bush's"National security strategy of the nation"Issued in sept 2001, which advanced the way of"Prophylactic war, Reporting the document as a"Blueprint in order to obtain a global pax americana, meacher shares knowledge: "The plan shows bush's cabinet intended to take military control of the gulf region no matter if saddam hussein was in power.It says 'while the unresolved conflict with iraq provides approval, the need for a vital american force presence in the gulf transcends the issue of the regime of saddam hussein, The data, he loans, includes the warning that it would be difficult to win public support for a military campaign to rework the us into"Future dominant force"With no need of"Some disastrous and catalyzing event like a new pearl harbor, with sept 11, the managing had just such an event: "The 9/11 attacks allowed the us to press the 'go' button for a strategy relative to the pnac agenda which it would otherwise have been politically impossible to implement, Having established the political motive for welcoming a version of a terrorist provocation on us soil, meacher goes on to raise substantive doubts about the official us response to the ample warnings of impending acts of terrorism as well as to the attacks themselves.He carefully documents each of his charges with specific personal to reports that appeared in the mainstream media. "It is known that at least 11 destinations provided advance warning to the us of the 9/11 attacks.Two senior mossad experts were sent to houston Pandora Charms 2014 in august 2001 to alert the cia and fbi to a cell of 200 terrorists said to be preparing a big operation(A day telegraph, sept 16, 2001).The list they provided included what they are called of four of the 9/11 hijackers, none of whom was busted, Against the bush administration's repeated claims that no one sale had ever contemplated the use of hijacked airplanes to execute terrorist attacks, meacher cites 1996 and 1999 learning ability reports that warned precisely of such a threat. He also raises right now of whether us intelligence had undisclosed connections with those alleged to have organized the hijacking,dating back to to the war against the soviet backed regime in afghanistan. "Fifteen of the 9/11 hijackers achieved their visas in saudi arabia,meacher contributes. "Ervin springman,the first sort head of the american visa bureau in jeddah,has stated that since 1987 the cia has been illicitly issuing visas to unqualified applicants from the middle east and bringing them to the us for training in terrorism for the afghan war side by side with bin laden(Bbc,the fall of 6,2001).It seems this process continued after the afghan war for other purposes.It is also reported that five of the hijackers received training at secure us military installs in the 1990s(Newsweek,sept 15,2001), The british labourite points to the well known decision of the fbi in washington to suppress a study into zacarias moussaoui(Now called the 20th hijacker by us prosecutors)Despite a warning from a local agent that he could be a part of a plot to crash a plane into the twin towers.Like a?Ended up standard faa intercept procedures for hijacked aircraft before 9/11.Between september 2000 and june 2001 the us military launched fighter aircraft on 67 occasions to chase distrustful aircraft(Ap, august.13, 2002).It is a us legal requirement that once an aircraft has moved notably off its flight plan, fighter planes are sent up to check into, All of these leads meacher to pose his question:Who ordered the us national security tool to"Are down, He further points to extensive evidence of the relative us not caring to pursuing osama bin laden, the alleged mastermind Pandora Beada of the sept 11 attacks, quoting one us official as saying that his capture could cause a"Premature collapse of our worldwide effort, Meacher claims that washington's"'war on terrorism' is being used largely as bogus cover for achieving wider US strategic geopolitical intent, "Definitely, 9/11 offered an exceptionally convenient pretext to put the pnac plan into action, he produces. "Evidence is quite clear that plans for military action against afghanistan and iraq were in hand well before 9/11, he points to a sept 18, 2001 bbc report that us officials warned pakistan in july 2001 two months prior to the terrorist attacks that us"Military action against afghanistan would go ahead by the biggest market of october, Meacher information: "With all this background, it is unsurprising that some have seen the us failure to avert the 9/11 attacks as creating an invaluable pretext for attacking afghanistan, in a war that had clearly previously been well planned in advance, he suggests that you've a precedent for the bush administration's inaction on september 11 in the similar failure of president roosevelt to heed warnings of an impending japanese attack on pearl harbor, an event that fueled sufficient public outrage to arrive at his administration's goal of bringing the us into the second world war. The former environment minister argues that motivation for the afghanistan and iraq wars was to seize control of strategic sources of oil and natural gas in both the caspian and persian gulf regions. Meacher proves: "Concluding of all this analysis must surely be that the 'global war on terrorism' has the hallmarks of a political myth propagated to pave the way for a wholly different agenda the us goal of world hegemony, built around securing by force command over the oil supplies expected to drive the whole project.Is this myth and junior begin, you can in this project really a proper aspiration for british foreign policy, None of the text provided by meacher is new;It has merely been tucked quietly away from the broad public.Considerably more often bitter divisions within ruling circles, both in the usa and britain, have brought it to the image surface.


Buď první, kdo ohodnotí tento článek.

Nový komentář

Přihlásit se
  Ještě nemáte vlastní web? Můžete si jej zdarma založit na

Aktuální články